CLEAN: WikiLeaks founder Assange granted bail in London

The transcript discusses a case of gross injustice that has been partially corrected, allowing a man to be free under certain conditions. There is uncertainty about who requested the bail, with the Swedes denying involvement and legal figures like Starmer QC also distancing themselves. The transcript ends with open questions about who acted on behalf of the Swedes.

What was the main outcome discussed in the first section regarding the individual's situation?

• The individual will receive compensation.

• The individual will be deported.

• The individual will be free but with conditions.

• The individual will remain in custody.

What was the initial belief about who requested the bail?

• The British government

• The Swedes

• The European Union

• The United Nations

What did the Swedes do in response to the claim about the bail request?

• They denied the claim.

• They supported the claim.

• They confirmed the claim.

• They ignored the claim.

Who is mentioned as having denied involvement in the bail request?

• The European Court

• The Swedish Ambassador

• The Prime Minister

• The Director of Public Prosecutions

What is the main question posed in the final section?

• Who gave the order on behalf of the Swedes?

• Who will pay for the bail?

• What are the conditions of the bail?

• When will the trial begin?