CLEAN: Fukushima still unsafe despite cold shutdown: Greenpeace

The transcript discusses the ongoing issues with contaminated water leaks at the reactor site and criticizes TEPCO for misleading claims about a core shutdown. It highlights the Japanese government's focus on following their agenda rather than ensuring public safety. The text emphasizes that achieving reactor stability is a long-term process, taking up to 40 years, and that current shutdown claims do not reflect the true safety conditions for workers and the public.

What issue was identified with the reactors and turbine buildings?

• They were overheating.

• Contaminated water was leaking to the ocean.

• They were completely shut down.

• They were producing too much energy.

Why should TEPCO not claim a core shutdown?

• It misleads people into thinking the reactor is safe.

• It speeds up the reactor's stabilization.

• It increases the risk of radiation.

• It causes more water leakage.

What was the Japanese government's main focus regarding the reactor issue?

• Increasing energy production.

• Improving reactor technology.

• Reducing the workforce.

• Deflecting attention from their failures.

What is the estimated time required to stabilize the reactor?

• 40 years

• 30 years

• 20 years

• 10 years

What does the core shutdown mean for the workers on site?

• It has no real impact on their safety.

• It increases their pay.

• It ensures their safety.

• It reduces their workload.