VOICED: Argentine vets seek to mark unnamed Falkla

The video discusses the issue of 123 unidentified Argentinian soldiers buried in a mass grave with a simple epitaph. Many soldiers lacked ID tags, leading to their anonymity. Veterans view this as a lack of recognition from their homeland. There is a debate over using DNA tests to identify the bodies, with some veterans preferring traditional remembrance methods. The historical context of the disappeared during the Argentinian dictatorship is highlighted, and a legal review of DNA identification requests is underway. Families are increasingly supporting DNA identification, but with concerns about potential repatriation. The video concludes with families visiting the Falklands to honor their fallen relatives, emphasizing the emotional and political significance of the burial site.

What is the main issue highlighted in the first section regarding the unidentified soldiers?

• The soldiers were buried with full honors.

• The soldiers were buried in individual graves.

• The soldiers were given proper identification.

• The soldiers remain unidentified, which is seen as a lack of recognition.

What is one of the proposed solutions to identify the soldiers mentioned in the second section?

• Using traditional economic lobbying.

• Conducting DNA tests on the exhumed bodies.

• Erecting new memorials.

• Holding annual remembrance ceremonies.

Why do some veterans oppose the idea of DNA testing?

• They prefer traditional economic lobbying.

• They believe it is too expensive.

• They want to focus on remembrance rather than identification.

• They think it will disturb the peace of the cemetery.

What historical event is referenced in the final section to provide context for the unidentified soldiers?

• The Spanish Civil War.

• World War II.

• The Argentinian dictatorship and the disappeared victims.

• The Falklands War.

What concern is raised about the potential outcome of the DNA identification process?

• It might lead to the repatriation of soldiers to England.

• It could result in financial burdens for families.

• It may cause political unrest in Argentina.

• It could delay the legal review process.