CLEAN: Protestors march to demand Chicago frees activists

The transcript discusses skepticism towards charges against protesters, emphasizing the lack of evidence and the suppression of free speech. It criticizes NATO's presence and the labeling of protesters as terrorists, highlighting the irony given known terrorists in town. The speaker advocates for peaceful protest and condemns repression by authorities like the FBI and NATO.

What is the speaker's main concern regarding the charges against protesters?

• The charges are supported by NATO.

• The charges are based on compelling evidence.

• The charges aim to suppress free speech and protest.

• The charges are meant to protect public safety.

How does the speaker view the charges of terrorism against protesters?

• As a humorous and egregious act.

• As a necessary measure for security.

• As a way to support NATO's presence.

• As a justified response to violence.

According to the speaker, who should be charged with terrorism?

• Peaceful protesters.

• All attendees of the protest.

• Known terrorists who harm innocents.

• NATO officials.

What does the speaker suggest should happen to peaceful protesters?

• They should be monitored closely.

• They should be immediately released.

• They should be detained indefinitely.

• They should be charged with minor offenses.

What does the speaker emphasize as important in the face of repression?

• Ignoring the repression.

• Standing together in solidarity.

• Individual action.

• Supporting NATO's efforts.