CLEAN: Chinese authorities unlikely to allow Chen to leave: analyst

The transcript discusses Mr. Chan's decision to leave the embassy due to threats to his family's safety. After leaving, he realized the risks to his personal safety and considered leaving the country. The Chinese authorities might react strongly to his escape, possibly detaining his family or isolating them to prevent contact with sympathizers. China's surveillance system is extensive, with significant control over dissidents. The political climate in China remains unchanged, with no signs of liberalization. Local governance issues, including budget management, are also highlighted.

Why did Mr. Chan feel compelled to leave the embassy?

• His family's safety was threatened.

• He was offered a better job opportunity.

• He wanted to join a political movement.

• He was invited by foreign diplomats.

What might the Chinese authorities do in response to Mr. Chan's actions?

• Offer him a government position.

• Ignore his actions completely.

• Seek revenge to regain face.

• Publicly praise his bravery.

What is a possible fate for Mr. Chan and his family according to the transcript?

• They might be given asylum in another country.

• They might receive a public apology from the government.

• They could be relocated to an isolated province.

• They will be allowed to live freely in Beijing.

What is the annual budget of China's enforcement apparatus?

• 700 billion U.S. dollars

• 500 billion U.S. dollars

• 1 trillion U.S. dollars

• 300 billion U.S. dollars

What is the likelihood of political liberalization in China in the near future?

• Somewhat likely

• Already happening

• Unlikely

• Very likely