CLEAN : Kenyan lawmakers vote to pull out

The transcript discusses the debate over Kenya's potential withdrawal from the Rome Statute, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the Kenyan constitution and the implications of international perception. It highlights historical instances where Kenyan leaders were tried within the country, arguing against external trials as a miscarriage of justice. The speaker expresses confidence in international justice systems like the Hague, reflecting on past decisions by Kenyan leadership to engage with these systems.

What is the main concern about Kenya withdrawing from the Rome Statute?

• It would increase foreign investment.

• It would strengthen Kenya's legal system.

• It would lead to economic sanctions.

• It would damage Kenya's international reputation.

Why does the speaker argue that the President cannot be tried in another country?

• Because the President is not subject to any laws.

• Because the President has diplomatic immunity.

• Because the President is always right.

• Because it is against the rules of natural justice.

What historical example does the speaker use to argue against trying the President in another country?

• The trial of Nelson Mandela.

• The arrest of Jomo Kenyatta during colonial times.

• The impeachment of Richard Nixon.

• The exile of Napoleon Bonaparte.

What was the initial stance of Kenyan MPs regarding the Hague?

• They were against going to the Hague.

• They were indifferent about the Hague.

• They supported going to the Hague.

• They were unaware of the Hague.

How does the speaker personally feel about the Hague system?

• The speaker is unaware of the Hague system.

• The speaker has confidence in the Hague system.

• The speaker is skeptical of the Hague system.

• The speaker is indifferent to the Hague system.