CLEAN : Femen protesters in French court after Not

The video discusses a trial against famine, which is perceived as a baseless accusation without proof. The speaker expresses confidence in their actions, asserting they were legal and caused no damage. The latter part of the transcript contains unrelated and unclear content.

What does the speaker compare the trial against famine to?

• A peaceful negotiation

• A legal proceeding

• A fair judgment

• A witch hunt

Why does the speaker believe Notre Dame should not have taken them to trial?

• They had already apologized

• They had proof of innocence

• They were not involved

• Judgment should be left to God

What is the speaker's stance on apologizing for their actions?

• They will apologize if proven wrong

• They are willing to apologize

• They have already apologized

• They refuse to apologize

What reason does the speaker give for not regretting their actions?

• They were forced to act

• Their actions were legal

• They were unaware of the consequences

• They were following orders

What is the nature of the final section of the transcript?

• A list of accusations

• An incoherent mix of phrases

• A coherent argument

• A detailed explanation