CLEAN : Pistorius difficult to argue self-defence,

The transcript discusses the legal implications of taking preemptive action without identifying the threat's nature. It examines extraneous factors in a case, such as relationships and arguments, and analyzes potential outcomes of a murder conviction, focusing on negligence and indirect intention to kill.

What is a key consideration in preemptive self-defense actions?

• Being in a public place

• Having a personal relationship with the intruder

• Ensuring the door is open

• Identifying the threat before acting

Which of the following is considered irrelevant in determining the justification of a shooting?

• The nature of the threat

• The location of the incident

• The personal relationship between the individuals

• The seriousness of the threat

If Pastorious is convicted of murder, what is unlikely to be the reason?

• Gross negligence

• Premeditation

• Self-defense

• Indirect intention

What might indicate gross negligence in a shooting case?

• Carefully planning the act

• Being provoked by the victim

• Acting without regard for the circumstances

• Having a clear intention to harm

What could be a reason for indirect intention to kill?

• Being unaware of the law

• Having a detailed plan

• Being enraged and firing without consideration

• Acting in a calm and collected manner