Armstrong: Trump Victory Would Be Risk Premium Event

Armstrong: Trump Victory Would Be Risk Premium Event

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the intense focus on the U.S. election, highlighting the legal history involving Trump and the economic implications of a Trump or Clinton victory. It includes perspectives from the UK on voter turnout and the unpredictability of elections, drawing parallels with Brexit. The discussion also covers the differences between the electoral and popular vote, emphasizing the potential for a status quo outcome and the limited power of a president to effect change.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the role of Mr. Castle Wits in relation to Mr. Trump?

He was Trump's campaign manager.

He was Trump's attorney in a lawsuit.

He was a political advisor to Trump.

He was a journalist covering Trump's campaign.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential economic effect of a Trump victory as discussed in the video?

Increased stability in global markets.

A decrease in fiscal spending.

A reduction in tax rates for the middle class.

A short-term boost to the economy.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is voter turnout considered crucial in the election?

It determines the number of electoral votes.

It reflects the popularity of the candidates.

It is used to predict future election trends.

It can significantly impact the election outcome.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What historical example is given to illustrate the difference between the popular vote and the electoral vote?

The election of Bill Clinton.

The election of Barack Obama.

The election of Al Gore.

The election of George W. Bush.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is suggested as the best approach for a president to support the economy?

Increasing government spending.

Implementing aggressive fiscal policies.

Reducing taxes for corporations.

Allowing the economy to function without interference.