Trump vs. Clinton: Who Is Better for Health-Care Stocks?

Trump vs. Clinton: Who Is Better for Health-Care Stocks?

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Health Sciences, Social Studies, Biology

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video explores the impact of government gridlock on healthcare stocks, highlighting that divided control in Washington tends to benefit the sector. It breaks down healthcare into various sectors, focusing on pharmaceuticals and the potential influence of a Hillary Clinton presidency on drug pricing. The discussion also covers the implications of repealing or modifying Obamacare, particularly under different political scenarios, such as a Trump presidency with a Republican-controlled Congress.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the effect of government gridlock on healthcare stocks?

It has no effect on healthcare stocks.

It benefits healthcare stocks.

It negatively impacts healthcare stocks.

It causes healthcare stocks to fluctuate wildly.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which sectors are included in the healthcare industry according to the transcript?

Providers, payers, and pharmaceutical companies

Only pharmaceutical companies

Only providers and payers

Only biotech companies

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is expected to happen to pharmaceutical pricing under a Clinton presidency?

There will be continued pressure to control prices.

Prices will increase due to lack of regulation.

Prices will decrease significantly.

Prices will remain unchanged.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the potential impact of repealing Obamacare on healthcare providers?

It would be dangerous for providers.

It would have no impact on providers.

It would be beneficial for providers.

It would lead to increased profits for providers.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How would a Republican-controlled government affect the repeal of Obamacare?

It would have no effect on the repeal process.

It would ensure Obamacare is strengthened.

It would prevent any changes to Obamacare.

It would make repeal more likely and increase uncertainty.