Gina Miller interview soundbite on Article 50 Supreme Court Case

Gina Miller interview soundbite on Article 50 Supreme Court Case

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses a constitutional case related to Brexit, highlighting its significance beyond a mere technicality. It explores the legal precedents involved, particularly the Miller case, and the potential dangers of government overreach without parliamentary approval. The video illustrates how constitutional law impacts everyday life, with examples of public engagement and interest in legal matters. It concludes with an international perspective on the UK's efficient rule of law, emphasizing the positive outcomes of the case.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main concern regarding the Miller case as discussed in the first section?

The influence of the media on public opinion

The role of the European Union

The potential for government to bypass parliamentary approval

The economic impact of Brexit

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which historical reference was mentioned in the second section to highlight the absurdities in the case?

The Magna Carta

The French Revolution

The American Revolution

Newfoundland lobster farmers and proclamations from 1610

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the second section describe the role of constitutional law?

As a tool for economic growth

As a complex and irrelevant field

As a fundamental aspect of everyday life

As a historical artifact

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the public's reaction to constitutional law as mentioned in the final section?

Indifference and lack of interest

Increased engagement and discussion

Confusion and misunderstanding

Hostility and opposition

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What international perspective is highlighted in the final section regarding the UK's rule of law?

It is considered highly efficient

It is criticized for being too rigid

It is seen as inefficient and outdated

It is largely ignored