Uber Pulls Self-Driving Cars Off San Francisco Streets

The transcript discusses Uber's refusal to obtain permits for its self-driving cars in California, despite the state's supportive stance on autonomous vehicle testing. It highlights public sentiment towards self-driving cars, Uber's regulatory challenges, and the company's approach to innovation and employment. The discussion also touches on the broader impact of automation on jobs and the role of established companies in driving automotive innovation.

Why did Uber refuse to get permits for its self-driving cars in California?

• The permits were too expensive.

• Uber believed the cars were not truly self-driving.

• California did not offer permits for self-driving cars.

• Uber wanted to test the cars in another state.

What was California's stance on self-driving cars?

• California was against self-driving cars.

• California encouraged the testing of self-driving cars.

• California banned all self-driving cars.

• California was indifferent to self-driving cars.

What was Uber's approach to regulation according to the transcript?

• Look for forgiveness rather than permission.

• Avoid regulations entirely.

• Seek permission before acting.

• Comply strictly with all regulations.

How might self-driving technology impact employment according to the transcript?

• It will create more jobs for drivers.

• It will replace some jobs with automation.

• It will have no impact on employment.

• It will only affect the tech industry.

Which companies are leading the innovation in self-driving technology?

• Only traditional automakers like Ford.

• Only new startups.

• Tech companies like Google and Tesla.

• Government agencies.