Parliament To Approve Government Brexit Plans - Supreme Court

The court ruled that only Parliament can trigger the Brexit process, rejecting a role for devolved legislatures. The government expressed disappointment but acknowledged the rule of law. Gina Miller, the lead claimant, emphasized the importance of parliamentary debate. The opposition criticized the Prime Minister's judgment, and political tensions arose, with calls for a white paper detailing Brexit plans. The verdict highlighted the balance of power between Parliament and the executive, with MPs and Lords ultimately deciding the terms of triggering Article 50.

What was the main outcome of the court's decision regarding Brexit?

• The Prime Minister can trigger Brexit without Parliament.

• Parliament alone has the power to trigger Brexit.

• The devolved legislatures have a role in triggering Brexit.

• The decision was left to the European Union.

How did the government react to the court's decision?

• They decided to ignore the decision.

• They were disappointed with the decision.

• They were indifferent to the decision.

• They were pleased with the decision.

What was the Brexit Secretary's stance on the legislation process?

• It would require a complete overhaul of the plans.

• It would not interrupt the Prime Minister's timetable.

• It would be decided by the devolved legislatures.

• It would significantly delay the Prime Minister's plans.

What concern did the Scottish Government express after the verdict?

• They had no concerns about the verdict.

• They believed the verdict strengthened their position.

• They felt the extra powers promised were worthless.

• They were satisfied with the extra powers promised.

What was Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn's approach following the verdict?

• He fully supported the government's Brexit plans.

• He aimed to block Brexit entirely.

• He had no clear stance on the issue.

• He tried to balance issuing red lines with not thwarting Brexit.