What Do We Know About Trump's Supreme Court Pick?

The transcript discusses the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court by President Trump. It highlights Gorsuch's conservative roots and his appeal to both Republicans and some Senate Democrats. Gorsuch's judicial philosophy as a textualist, following in the footsteps of Antonin Scalia, is explored. The political dynamics, including potential Democratic filibusters and the Republican majority's ability to confirm Gorsuch, are analyzed. The discussion concludes with the implications of the nomination process and the upcoming Senate vote.

What is one reason Neil Gorsuch's nomination might be less contentious?

• He has no judicial experience.

• He has strong liberal roots.

• He is more acceptable to Senate Democrats.

• He was nominated by a Democratic president.

What is a key aspect of Neil Gorsuch's judicial philosophy?

• He is a proponent of judicial activism.

• He often rules based on personal beliefs.

• He believes in interpreting laws based on their text.

• He supports giving more power to executive agencies.

Why might Senate Democrats find Gorsuch's views on executive agencies appealing?

• He opposes any form of judicial review.

• He has no opinion on executive agencies.

• He supports increasing their power.

• He challenges the deference courts give to them.

What strategy might Democrats use in response to Gorsuch's nomination?

• They will ignore the nomination process.

• They plan to nominate their own candidate.

• They could attempt to filibuster the nomination.

• They might support him unanimously.

What advantage do Republicans have in confirming Gorsuch?

• They have a majority in the Senate.

• They have bipartisan support.

• They have the president's veto power.

• They have public opinion on their side.