NY AG Eric Schneiderman Explains 'Sanctuary Cities'

NY AG Eric Schneiderman Explains 'Sanctuary Cities'

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses President Trump's stance on sanctuary cities, highlighting his threat to cut off funds to states like California. It explains the guidelines issued to local governments regarding cooperation with federal immigration laws and the limits of federal power in enforcing these laws. The discussion also covers potential legal actions against federal overreach and the efforts to protect New Yorkers from harmful federal policies, including healthcare and discrimination issues.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was President Trump's proposed action against sanctuary cities?

Cut off funds to states or cities providing sanctuary

Encourage sanctuary cities to cooperate with federal laws

Increase funding to sanctuary cities

Provide legal support to sanctuary cities

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main issue with the term 'sanctuary' as discussed in the video?

It is clearly defined in federal law

It is a misnomer with no clear definition

It is universally accepted by all states

It is a term used only in California

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What limits the federal government's power to coerce local governments?

Federal government can cut off any funds at will

Local governments must always comply with federal requests

The funds must be directly tied to the program at issue

The funds must be used in a coercive way

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What role do state attorneys play in response to federal overreach?

They only focus on environmental laws

They have no role in federal matters

They protect citizens from harmful federal actions

They support federal policies unconditionally

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How might the repeal of Obamacare lead to legal action from New York?

If it only affects California

If it increases funding for healthcare

If it interferes with healthcare funding

If it has no impact on healthcare