NBA Commissioner Tries to Settle Knicks-Oakley Dispute

NBA Commissioner Tries to Settle Knicks-Oakley Dispute

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Physical Ed

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses a conflict between Charles Oakley and the Knicks management, highlighting the intervention by a mediator who has known Oakley for years. The mediator, along with Michael Jordan, facilitated a meeting between Oakley and Jim Dolan to resolve misunderstandings and rebuild relationships. The meeting ended with apologies and a plan for Oakley to rejoin the NBA family, emphasizing the importance of relationship building and reconciliation.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the primary reason the narrator felt the need to intervene in the conflict between Charles Oakley and the Knicks management?

He had known Charles Oakley for a long time and believed he was misunderstood.

He was asked by the NBA to mediate the situation.

He wanted to gain publicity for his own career.

He wanted to improve his relationship with the Knicks.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who joined the mediation efforts as a mediator due to his close relationship with Charles Oakley?

LeBron James

Kobe Bryant

Michael Jordan

Shaquille O'Neal

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was one of the key actions taken to resolve the conflict between Oakley and Dolan?

A public apology from the Knicks management.

A face-to-face meeting between Oakley and Dolan.

A press conference to address the media.

A legal settlement between the parties.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What gesture did Jim Dolan make to show goodwill towards Charles Oakley?

He invited Oakley to a game as his guest.

He offered Oakley a job with the Knicks.

He gave Oakley a public apology.

He donated to Oakley's charity.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the emotional response of Charles Oakley during the meeting, and how was it perceived?

He was happy, indicating immediate resolution.

He was angry, leading to further conflict.

He was very emotional, and it was understood by all parties.

He was indifferent, which surprised everyone.