CLEAN : FILE: S.Africa revokes decision to leave ICC

The video discusses the South African government's decision to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the legal challenges against it. The decision is criticized for not following constitutional procedures, and the video explores the implications of this withdrawal, including the executive's prerogative in international agreements. The discussion highlights the procedural and legal aspects of the withdrawal process and concludes with the potential consequences of this decision.

What is the main reason for challenging the South African Government's decision to withdraw from the ICC?

• It was a popular decision among citizens.

• It was taken without following the proper procedure.

• It was too expensive.

• It was supported by all parties.

What is required for a country to officially withdraw from the Rome Statute?

• A unanimous vote in Parliament.

• Submission of a written notice to the UN Secretary-General.

• Approval from the ICC.

• A public referendum.

How long after the UN Secretary-General receives the notification does the withdrawal from the Rome Statute take effect?

• Two years.

• One year.

• Six months.

• Immediately.

Who holds the prerogative to negotiate and accede to international agreements according to the transcript?

• The Parliament.

• The Judiciary.

• The Executive.

• The Citizens.

What does the executive believe about the legal difficulties arising from the withdrawal?

• The legal issues are unresolved.

• The withdrawal is illegal.

• There are no anticipated legal difficulties.

• There will be significant legal challenges.