Sir Malcolm Rifkind interview on Syria airstrikes

The video discusses the impact of recent events in Syria on the use of chemical weapons and international relations. It highlights that Assad is unlikely to use chemical weapons again due to a significant U.S. military strike, which serves as a deterrent. Additionally, the video explores how these events have altered the international dynamics, particularly involving Russia, and have pushed towards renewed diplomatic efforts for a peaceful resolution in Syria.

What was the primary reason Assad is unlikely to use chemical weapons again?

• He has been overthrown.

• He has reached a peace agreement with the U.S.

• He has run out of chemical weapons.

• He fears another, possibly larger, military strike from the U.S.

How did the U.S. military involvement change the situation in Syria?

• It increased the use of chemical weapons.

• It led to the withdrawal of Russian forces.

• It resulted in a peace treaty.

• It altered the power dynamics, challenging Russia's dominance.

What was Russia's initial reaction to the U.S. military actions in Syria?

• They were supportive.

• They were indifferent.

• They immediately sought peace talks.

• They were furious and disagreeable.

Which countries were mentioned as having marginal involvement in Syria before the U.S. military strike?

• Iran and Turkey

• China and India

• United States and United Kingdom

• France and Germany

What is the expected outcome of the changed international dynamics in Syria?

• An increase in military conflicts.

• A complete withdrawal of all foreign forces.

• An economic embargo on Syria.

• A new diplomatic effort for peace.