CLEAN : Thousands of protesters join March for Science in DC

The video discusses the intersection of science and politics, emphasizing that while science is political, it should not be partisan. It highlights concerns about political decisions affecting science funding and innovation, particularly in the U.S. The speaker expresses worry over the loss of respect and funding for federal science agencies and criticizes the leadership of the EPA, advocating for policies based on science and values rather than ideology.

What is the main message about science in the introduction?

• Science is a partisan issue.

• Science is political but not partisan.

• Science should be ignored in politics.

• Science should serve only scientists.

What concern does the speaker express about science funding?

• Science funding is increasing rapidly.

• Science funding is not necessary.

• Science funding is being threatened.

• There is too much funding for science.

Why is the speaker worried about federal agencies?

• They are losing respect and funding.

• They are becoming too political.

• They are not supporting science enough.

• They are gaining too much power.

What is the contradiction mentioned about Scott Pruitt?

• He supports the EPA wholeheartedly.

• He has never sued the EPA.

• He has no connection to the EPA.

• He sued the EPA but now leads it.

According to the speaker, what should policy be based on?

• Political agendas.

• Science and values.

• Ideology and dogma.

• Public opinion.