Uber Fires Levandowski for Failing to Comply With Inquiry

The transcript discusses a legal case involving Uber and Anthony Levandowski, focusing on a preliminary injunction requiring the submission of paperwork related to self-driving technology. Levandowski invoked his Fifth Amendment rights, leading to his job termination. The case raises questions about Uber's potential legal consequences and Levandowski's future cooperation with investigators. Legal arguments center on the conflict between Levandowski's rights and job security. The next steps involve court filings and potential disclosures about the termination terms.

What was the consequence if neither Uber nor Levandowski turned over the required paperwork?

• The case would be dismissed.

• Uber would receive a fine.

• Levandowski would be promoted.

• Levandowski's job would be threatened.

What right did Levandowski invoke to avoid testifying in the case?

• Eighth Amendment

• Sixth Amendment

• Fifth Amendment

• First Amendment

What argument did Levandowski's attorneys make regarding his termination?

• It was a mutual decision.

• It was due to poor performance.

• It was a breach of contract.

• It was a violation of his Fifth Amendment rights.

What is the next step for Uber in the legal proceedings?

• To detail the terms of Levandowski's termination in court.

• To file a new lawsuit.

• To settle the case out of court.

• To hire a new CEO.

What is the main question regarding Levandowski's future actions?

• Whether he will sue Uber.

• Whether he will move to another country.

• Whether he will speak to federal investigators.

• Whether he will start a new company.