Announcement from NJ Gov. Harold Hoffman that Bruno Hauptmann, convicted kidnapper of Lindbergh baby, will be executed

The governor discusses his decision to grant a reprieve to Bruno Richard Hoffman, explaining the constitutional provisions and interpretations regarding the governor's power to grant reprieves. He highlights the advice from the Attorney General and his own interpretation, ultimately concluding that he is now without power to grant further reprieves due to the elapsed time since the initial decision.

What was the governor's initial stance on granting reprieves to Bruno Richard Hoffman?

• He refused to grant any reprieves.

• He was undecided about granting any reprieves.

• He stated it would be the first and only reprieve.

• He planned to grant multiple reprieves.

What was the main constitutional debate regarding the governor's power?

• Whether the governor could grant reprieves for a period not exceeding 90 days after conviction.

• Whether the governor could grant reprieves after a conviction.

• Whether the governor could grant reprieves without consulting the Attorney General.

• Whether the governor could grant reprieves for more than 90 days.

According to the Attorney General, what does the term 'conviction' refer to?

• The issuance of the warrant of execution.

• The final action in the trial court.

• The initial arrest of the individual.

• The governor's decision to grant a reprieve.

What concern did the governor express about the interpretation of 'conviction'?

• It would allow the governor to grant unlimited reprieves.

• It would require the governor to consult the Attorney General for every reprieve.

• It would deprive the governor of any right of reprieve.

• It would make the reprieve process too complicated.

Why is the governor unable to grant a further stay?

• He has changed his mind about the reprieve.

• He believes he no longer has the power under the constitutional provision.

• The Attorney General advised against it.

• The reprieve period has not yet elapsed.