VOICED : US: Herbicide and matching GMO crops divide mid west farmers

The video discusses the use of dicamba, a powerful pesticide, and its impact on agriculture. It highlights the conflicts between farmers using dicamba-resistant seeds and those who do not, leading to reduced yields and disputes. The history of dicamba, its regulation, and the rise in complaints are covered, along with Monsanto's stance on user error. The environmental impact and new restrictions imposed by the US Environmental Agency and states are also discussed.

What is one of the main benefits of using dicamba-resistant seeds?

• They require less water.

• They are cheaper than other seeds.

• They allow for the use of dicamba without damaging crops.

• They grow faster than other seeds.

What was a significant consequence of dicamba use among farmers?

• A decrease in the cost of farming equipment.

• Conflicts and reduced yields for those not using resistant seeds.

• Improved relationships between neighboring farmers.

• Increased crop yields for all farmers.

When did dicamba first become available for use?

• In the 1960s.

• In the 2000s.

• In the 1980s.

• In the 1990s.

What does Monsanto attribute the problems with dicamba to?

• User error in application.

• The quality of the seeds.

• The type of soil used.

• The weather conditions.

How did the US Environmental Agency respond to the dicamba issue?

• By increasing subsidies for dicamba-resistant seeds.

• By ignoring the complaints.

• By imposing additional restrictions on its use.

• By banning dicamba completely.