The Warren Court Explained: US History Review

The Warren Court Explained: US History Review

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies

6th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video tutorial covers the concept of judicial review and constitutional interpretation, focusing on key Supreme Court cases. It discusses restrictive cases where the court ruled in favor of government power over civil liberties and highlights the Warren Court's role in expanding civil liberties through the 14th Amendment. The tutorial also examines significant cases like Brown v. Board of Education, Miranda v. Arizona, and Gideon v. Wainwright, emphasizing their impact on civil rights and liberties. The video concludes with a brief mention of additional cases relevant to exams.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which case established the principle of judicial review?

McCulloch vs. Maryland

Dred Scott vs. Sandford

Marbury vs. Madison

Gibbons vs. Ogden

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main issue in the case of Dred Scott vs. Sandford?

Right to privacy

Separation of powers

Slavery and citizenship

Freedom of speech

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which case challenged the legality of Japanese American internment during WWII?

Brown vs. Board of Education

Plessy vs. Ferguson

Gideon vs. Wainwright

Korematsu vs. United States

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was a significant impact of the Warren Court?

It reduced the role of the Supreme Court in civil rights.

It focused on economic regulations.

It expanded civil liberties using the 14th Amendment.

It limited the power of the federal government.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Engel vs. Vitale addressed which constitutional issue?

Freedom of speech

Establishment of religion

Right to bear arms

Right to privacy

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the exclusionary rule established in Mapp vs. Ohio?

Evidence must be shared with the defense before trial.

Only federal courts can exclude evidence.

Evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in court.

All evidence must be presented to the jury.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What rights are protected under Miranda vs. Arizona?

Right to a speedy trial

Right to free speech

Right to remain silent and have an attorney

Right to privacy

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?