Rep. Wasserman Schultz Calls Trump's SOTU Speech 'Divisive, Hateful'

Rep. Wasserman Schultz Calls Trump's SOTU Speech 'Divisive, Hateful'

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript features Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz's reaction to the President's speech, highlighting its divisive nature and lack of bipartisanship. She criticizes the proposed immigration policies, defense spending focus, and infrastructure budget cuts. The discussion also covers economic issues, including job growth and prescription drug pricing. The Congresswoman expresses concern over the President's approach to immigration and American values.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the congresswoman's main criticism of the President's speech?

It was overly detailed and complex.

It lacked a bipartisan spirit of cooperation.

It was too focused on economic growth.

It ignored international relations.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What concern did the congresswoman express about the President's focus on defense spending?

It would strengthen international alliances.

It would reduce military effectiveness.

It would lead to increased taxes.

It would neglect domestic programs.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the congresswoman skeptical about the President's infrastructure proposals?

The President proposed a significant cut to infrastructure in the past.

The President has a history of supporting infrastructure projects.

The President has already allocated funds for infrastructure.

The President has no interest in infrastructure development.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What economic issue did the congresswoman highlight in her critique?

Decreasing unemployment rates.

Rapid job growth.

Slow job growth since 2010.

High inflation rates.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the congresswoman view the President's stance on immigration?

As a strategy to increase cultural diversity.

As a means to promote economic growth.

As a way to strengthen national security.

As a threat to America's role as a beacon of hope.