The video discusses the case of Graham v. Connor, where Graham, a diabetic, was mistakenly suspected of robbery by police due to his quick exit from a store. The police used excessive force, leading to a legal battle over Graham's Fourth Amendment rights. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the police, establishing the 'objective reasonableness' standard for evaluating police use of force. This precedent allows police to justify force based on perceived threats, impacting future cases and raising concerns about police conduct.

What was Graham's condition that led to the misunderstanding with Officer Connor?

• He was having a panic attack.

• He was suffering from a heart attack.

• He was experiencing an insulin reaction.

• He was having an allergic reaction.

What did the police officers assume about Graham during the arrest?

• He was a diabetic in need of help.

• He was intoxicated.

• He was a store employee.

• He was a victim of a crime.

What was the basis of Graham's lawsuit against the police officers?

• Violation of his First Amendment rights.

• Violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.

• Violation of his Eighth Amendment rights.

• Violation of his Tenth Amendment rights.

Which court initially agreed with the city, justifying the police officers' actions?

• The Supreme Court

• The State Court

• The District Court

• The Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit

What standard did the Supreme Court establish in the Graham v. Connor case?

• Subjective reasonableness

• Reasonable suspicion

• Objective reasonableness

• Probable cause

What does the 'objective reasonableness' standard allow police officers to do?

• Use force only with a warrant.

• Use force based on reasonable assumptions.

• Use force only when instructed by a superior.

• Use force based on personal feelings.

What is a potential consequence of the 'objective reasonableness' standard?

• Increased accountability for police actions.

• Easier justification of excessive force by police.

• More restrictions on police use of force.

• Decreased police presence in communities.