Ghosn Defends Himself in Court Saying He Was 'Wrongly Accused'

Ghosn Defends Himself in Court Saying He Was 'Wrongly Accused'

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

Carlos Ghosn, former CEO of Nissan and Renault, testified in a Tokyo court denying charges of financial misconduct, including underreporting earnings and passing personal investment losses to Nissan. He claimed innocence, stating actions were approved by Nissan executives. Ghosn's detention has been extended multiple times, with his legal team seeking bail. Renault continues to support him, with an interim CEO appointed. The alliance's future remains uncertain as Ghosn's legal battles continue.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Carlos Ghosn claim about the accusations against him in his testimony?

He accepted partial responsibility.

He refused to comment on the accusations.

He admitted to some of the charges.

He claimed he was wrongly accused and acted legally.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was one of the main charges against Carlos Ghosn?

Failing to disclose a conflict of interest.

Misusing company funds for personal travel.

Underreporting his earnings.

Overreporting his earnings.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why has Carlos Ghosn been detained for an extended period?

He requested to stay in detention.

He confessed to the charges.

He is considered a flight risk and at risk of evidence tampering.

He was found guilty in court.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the current status of Carlos Ghosn's position at Renault?

He has been permanently removed as CEO.

He is still the nominal CEO, but an interim CEO has been appointed.

He has been promoted to a higher position.

He has resigned from his position.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Under what condition might Renault consider removing Carlos Ghosn as CEO?

If he is found guilty in court.

If he is unable to perform his duties due to prolonged detention.

If he voluntarily steps down.

If the shareholders vote against him.