Renault Said to Be 'Ready' to Replace Ghosn

The transcript discusses Nissan's recent board decision, the challenges faced by interim CEOs, and the legal implications for Carlos Goen. It highlights the pressure on Renault to solidify leadership and the political dynamics in France, emphasizing the need for an even-handed approach to corporate governance.

What was the French government's initial stance regarding leadership changes at Nissan?

• They had no opinion on the matter.

• They intended to wait for Ghosn's return.

• They wanted to merge with Nissan.

• They supported immediate changes.

How did Renault initially respond to Nissan's decision to oust Carlos Ghosn?

• They agreed with Nissan's decision.

• They refused to go along with it.

• They proposed a merger instead.

• They remained neutral.

What is one reason Renault might have decided to remove Carlos Ghosn?

• To solidify leadership for operational purposes.

• To send a political signal.

• To increase Ghosn's salary.

• To merge with another automaker.

What kind of pressure is the French government facing in relation to the Carlos Ghosn case?

• Pressure to support the global elite.

• Pressure to show impartiality and fairness.

• Pressure to merge with Nissan.

• Pressure to increase Ghosn's salary.

How is the French government expected to handle the situation with Carlos Ghosn?

• As an industrial matter.

• As a political matter.

• By supporting Ghosn unconditionally.

• By ignoring it.