No Evidence Huawei Poses Any Threat to Other Countries, Says Chief Legal Officer

No Evidence Huawei Poses Any Threat to Other Countries, Says Chief Legal Officer

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Information Technology (IT), Architecture, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses Huawei's legal challenges in the US, focusing on the Section 889 ruling and its impact on Huawei's business. Despite the Congressional ban, Huawei aims to remain in the US market, emphasizing its commitment to fair competition and partnerships. The US accuses Huawei of security threats, but Huawei defends its 30-year security record. The transcript also touches on judicial independence and Meng Wanzhou's extradition case, which Huawei believes is politically motivated.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Huawei hoping to achieve by challenging the Section 889 ruling in the US?

To reduce their global workforce

To increase their market share in Europe

To participate in fair competition in the US market

To exit the US market completely

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What percentage of the global communications technology market does the US account for, according to Huawei?

20 to 30%

40 to 50%

10 to 15%

60 to 70%

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What has been a significant consequence of the US Congressional ban on Huawei equipment?

Increased partnerships with US companies

Improved global reputation

Loss of existing projects and opportunities

Expansion into new markets

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Huawei describe its security record over its 30-year history?

Inconsistent and unreliable

Controversial and disputed

Clear with no evidence of threats

Unproven and questionable

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Huawei's stance on requests from governments to install backdoors for intelligence?

They have never received such requests and would refuse them

They are open to negotiations

They would consider it if legally required

They have complied in the past