Musk Steps Up Panasonic Battery Spat

The transcript discusses Elon Musk's Twitter conflicts, focusing on Tesla's partnership with Panasonic. It highlights production constraints at their Nevada Giga factory, where lithium-ion cells for Tesla cars are produced. The partnership faces challenges due to production running below capacity, requiring increased car sales to boost demand. Despite disputes, the deep partnership is unlikely to end, as both companies are heavily invested. The transcript concludes with an analysis of potential future scenarios, emphasizing the importance of the partnership for both Tesla and Panasonic.

What is the main difference between Elon Musk's previous Twitter disputes and the one with Panasonic?

• It is with a key supplier.

• It concerns a legal battle.

• It involves a regulatory issue.

• It is about a new product launch.

What is the current production capacity of the Tesla-Panasonic factory compared to its goal?

• 30 GW hours, operating at 20

• 35 GW hours, operating at 24

• 40 GW hours, operating at 35

• 35 GW hours, operating at 30

What is suggested as a solution to increase battery production at the Tesla-Panasonic factory?

• Expanding the factory

• Increasing Tesla car sales

• Reducing production costs

• Finding new suppliers

Why is it unlikely for Tesla or Panasonic to exit their joint venture?

• They are deeply invested with no easy exit.

• The partnership is not profitable.

• They have legal obligations to continue.

• They have alternative suppliers.

What would be a major obstacle for Tesla to take over the factory completely?

• Lack of interest from Panasonic

• Insufficient capital and desire

• Regulatory restrictions

• Technical challenges