CLEAN : Syria blames US, Israel for talks deadlock

The transcript discusses a meeting where there was a disagreement over the agenda interpretation. One side proposed not fully finalizing the first item before moving on, which was opposed by the other side, emphasizing the need to respect the agenda. The discussion also touches on external influences, such as the American administration and President Obama's support for the opposition. Despite challenges, there is a commitment to continue negotiations in Geneva.

What was the initial disagreement about the meeting agenda?

• The order of the items

• The participants of the meeting

• The location of the meeting

• The need to finalize the first item immediately

Why did one side insist on respecting the agenda fully?

• To ensure each item is concluded with a common vision

• To avoid discussing sensitive topics

• To save time during the meeting

• To allow for more flexibility in discussions

What was the stance on moving from one agenda item to another?

• Each item must be fully considered and concluded

• Only the first item is important

• Items can be skipped if time is short

• Items can be discussed in any order

Which external party was mentioned as influencing the negotiation process?

• The European Union

• The United Nations

• President Obama

• The Russian Government

What was the commitment made regarding the Geneva talks?

• To hold them in a different location

• To abandon them if no progress is made

• To continue them as long as necessary

• To conclude them within a week