Sir Kier Starmer MP reaction to Supreme Court ruling on Parliament suspension

The transcript discusses a powerful and unanimous judgment against Boris Johnson, declaring his actions unlawful. It emphasizes the need for Parliament to resume its duties and challenge the government. The ruling sets a precedent due to the Prime Minister's unusual disregard for the law. The transcript concludes with a call for the government to respect Parliament and the law.

What was the nature of the judgment against Boris Johnson?

• It was a decision with no clear outcome.

• It was a split decision.

• It was a decision with a majority vote.

• It was a unanimous decision.

Why is the ruling considered significant?

• Because it was unanimous and involved senior judges.

• Because it was a decision made by a single judge.

• Because it involved a minor legal issue.

• Because it was a rare split decision.

What unusual action did the Prime Minister take?

• He acted unlawfully and misled the court.

• He followed all legal protocols.

• He consulted with Parliament before acting.

• He sought advice from international leaders.

What does the ruling imply about the status of Parliament?

• Parliament is permanently closed.

• Parliament is still in session.

• Parliament will reconvene next year.

• Parliament is dissolved indefinitely.

What should the Prime Minister do following the ruling?

• Delay any parliamentary sessions indefinitely.

• Seek advice from the Queen again.

• Have more regard for Parliament and the law.

• Ignore the ruling and continue as planned.