CLEAN : Malaysia's ex PM Najib's first 1MDB trial to proceed

The transcript discusses a legal case involving financial transactions and expectations of acquittal. The defense was confident in rebutting the prosecution's case, focusing on the accused's lack of knowledge about criminal intentions. The character of the accused is analyzed, highlighting that the money was not used for personal luxury but returned to a bank.

What was the initial reaction of the defense team regarding the charges?

• They were unsure about the outcome.

• They were indifferent to the charges.

• They were shocked and expected an acquittal.

• They were confident of a conviction.

How did the defense team feel about the judges' decision?

• They were surprised by the decision.

• They were worried about a conviction.

• They were confident of an acquittal.

• They were indifferent to the outcome.

What was the defense's main argument about the accused's knowledge?

• The accused planned the criminal activities.

• The accused denied knowing Joe Lou.

• The accused was unaware of Joe Lou's criminal intentions.

• The accused knew about Joe Lou's criminal intentions.

What does the defense claim about the accused's use of the money?

• The money was spent on personal luxuries.

• The money was hidden in offshore accounts.

• The money was returned to a bank.

• The money was donated to charity.

What does the defense suggest about the accused's character?

• The accused is a misunderstood individual.

• The accused is a philanthropist.

• The accused is a reckless spender.

• The accused is a known criminal.