Huawei Chief Security Officer Says FCC Action Is 'Beyond the Pale'

The transcript discusses a company's legal action against the FCC due to perceived violations of the Constitution and due process. It highlights the company's focus on global markets and digital inclusion, despite challenges in the US market. The impact of the US trade war on suppliers and jobs is addressed, emphasizing the need to separate national security from trade issues. The company advocates for international cooperation to enhance cybersecurity and proposes mechanisms to ensure data security and trust, countering concerns about ties to the Chinese government.

What is the main reason the company took legal action against the FCC?

• To comply with new regulations

• To protect their customers and jobs

• To increase their market share in the US

• To expand into new countries

How does the company view the impact of trade restrictions on their operations?

• As a minor inconvenience

• As a pawn in the US trade war

• As a threat to national security

• As an opportunity to innovate

What is the company's stance on the relationship between national security and trade?

• They should be closely linked

• They should be separate issues

• Trade should take precedence

• National security should take precedence

What is necessary to promote a safer cyberspace according to the company?

• Increased government surveillance

• Reducing the number of telecom operators

• Joint responsibility between governments and private companies

• More advanced technology

What mechanisms does the company propose to ensure product safety?

• Regular audits by the Chinese government

• Independent testing of products and code

• Complete transparency of all business operations

• Exclusive partnerships with US companies