Washington Roundup: Differences Between The Clinton & Trump Trials

David Hawkings discusses the differences between the current impeachment trial and the Clinton trial, highlighting the speed and partisanship of the current proceedings. Unlike the Clinton trial, which had agreed-upon rules and taped depositions, the current trial is marked by a lack of consensus and potential late-night sessions. The handling of witnesses and evidence is also notably different, with current discussions on whether House managers can present evidence without a separate vote.

How does Mitch McConnell's approach to the impeachment trial differ from the Bill Clinton trial?

• It is conducted entirely in private.

• It is slower and more detailed.

• It is faster and more restricted.

• It involves more live witnesses.

What was a key difference in witness handling between the current trial and the Clinton trial?

• The Clinton trial had no witnesses.

• The current trial uses taped depositions.

• The Clinton trial used only written statements.

• The current trial uses live witnesses.

In the current trial, what is required for the House managers to bring in evidence?

• A separate vote.

• No additional requirements.

• A unanimous decision by the Senate.

• Approval from the President.

What was unique about the rules of the Clinton impeachment trial?

• They were imposed by the Supreme Court.

• They were kept secret from the public.

• They were agreed upon by all 100 senators.

• They were decided by the President.

What is a potential challenge mentioned for the current trial sessions?

• They could extend into late night hours.

• They might be too short.

• They are held outdoors.

• They require international travel.