Salvini Suffers Setback in Italian Vote

The regional election in Rome was crucial for the Italian Social Democrats, as losing it would have destabilized the coalition government. The victory prevented a snap election and maintained stability. Salvini, who campaigned heavily, was the biggest loser, failing to trigger a national election. Despite his popularity, the coalition now has more time to solidify its plans. The traditional Social Democrats have gained ground, ensuring a pro-European government in Rome.

What was the potential impact on the Italian Social Democrats if they had lost the regional election in Rome?

• It would have increased their popularity.

• It would have resulted in more government funding.

• It would have led to a snap election.

• It would have strengthened their coalition.

How did Salvini approach the regional election in Rome?

• He avoided campaigning in the region.

• He supported the Social Democrats.

• He focused on national issues only.

• He made the election a personal campaign.

Despite losing in Rome, where did Salvini's party perform well?

• In the West

• In the South

• In the North

• In the East

What advantage did the election results provide to the coalition in Rome?

• More time to develop a coherent plan

• A mandate to change the constitution

• An opportunity to dissolve the government

• A chance to increase taxes

What is the political stance of the government in Rome following the election?

• Anti-European

• Neutral

• Pro-European

• Isolationist