How California Gave Consumers More Protection of Their Own Data

How California Gave Consumers More Protection of Their Own Data

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Information Technology (IT), Architecture

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the evolution of data privacy laws, focusing on the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). It highlights the impact of major data breaches and the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which led to increased scrutiny on data privacy. The CCPA, effective from 2020, grants Californians rights over their data, including access, deletion, and opting out of data sales. It also holds companies accountable for privacy violations. While the CCPA is specific to California, its influence extends beyond the state, prompting other states and federal discussions on privacy laws. Businesses face significant costs to comply with these regulations.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What major event in 2016 significantly raised awareness about data privacy issues?

The Target data breach

The launch of the CCPA

The introduction of the GDPR

The Cambridge Analytica scandal

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following is NOT a key feature of the CCPA?

Holding companies accountable for privacy violations

Opting out of data sales to third parties

Providing free internet access to all users

Allowing users to access and delete their data

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the estimated cost for businesses to comply with the CCPA?

$10 billion

$100 billion

$55 billion

$25 billion

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which companies are primarily targeted by the CCPA?

Small local businesses

Non-profit organizations

Big tech companies like Facebook and Google

Government agencies

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a major challenge in creating a federal data privacy law in the US?

Disagreements over consumer rights to sue

Lack of technology

Lack of public interest

Insufficient funding