Twitter Puts Warning on Trump’s Floyd Tweet For Glorifying Violence

The transcript discusses the conflict between President Trump and social media platforms, particularly Twitter, over his tweets about the Minneapolis protests. It highlights Twitter's response by obscuring Trump's tweets and the subsequent executive order signed by Trump targeting Article 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The discussion includes the implications of changing Article 230 for social media companies like Twitter and Facebook, focusing on their business models and content moderation challenges.

What action did President Trump take in response to Twitter's fact-checking of his tweets?

• He signed an executive order.

• He praised Twitter for their actions.

• He deleted his Twitter account.

• He ignored the situation.

What is the primary purpose of Article 230?

• To ensure all content is fact-checked.

• To protect online platforms from being treated as publishers.

• To ban all political content on social media.

• To make online platforms liable for all content.

How do social media companies like Facebook and Twitter manage content under Article 230?

• They are banned from moderating any content.

• They must delete all political content.

• They are not liable for user-generated content.

• They are required to fact-check every post.

What challenge would Twitter face if Article 230 were changed?

• It would no longer be able to post tweets.

• It would become the largest social media company.

• It would have to shut down its platform.

• It would need to hire a large number of fact-checkers.

What financial impact could changes to Article 230 have on Facebook?

• It would increase their profits by 10%.

• It would have no financial impact.

• It could reduce their EBITDAR by 10 percentage points.

• It would double their number of users.