Pres. Trump Wants Supreme Court To Revisit Flag Burning Case

Pres. Trump Wants Supreme Court To Revisit Flag Burning Case

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses President Trump's call to reverse the Supreme Court's 1989 decision protecting flag burning as free speech. Amid civil unrest following George Floyd's death, Trump urges governors to pass anti-flag burning laws. The 1989 ruling, stemming from a Dallas protest, was supported by Justice Scalia despite his personal opposition to flag burning. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has also defended the right to burn the flag, emphasizing freedom of expression. The transcript notes potential challenges in reversing the decision, with some justices likely supporting the original ruling.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What action did the President encourage governors to take regarding flag burning?

To promote flag burning as free speech

To ignore the issue

To pass laws making flag burning illegal

To support the Supreme Court's decision

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the 1989 Supreme Court ruling on flag burning?

It was protected as free speech

It was deemed illegal

It was left to individual states to decide

It was banned nationwide

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which former Supreme Court Justice sided with the majority in the 1989 flag burning case?

Justice Clarence Thomas

Justice Antonin Scalia

Justice Sonia Sotomayor

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Mitch McConnell's stance on flag burning?

He opposed it strongly

He supported it as a form of free speech

He had no opinion

He believed it should be punishable by law

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What potential outcome does the New York Times suggest regarding a Supreme Court challenge to the flag burning decision?

It will be ignored by the court

It may not turn out as the President hopes

It will definitely overturn the decision

It will be supported by all justices