Moral Luck: Crash Course Philosophy

Moral Luck: Crash Course Philosophy

Assessment

Interactive Video

Religious Studies, Other, Social Studies

11th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video explores moral responsibility and moral luck, using a scenario of two drunk drivers, A and B, to illustrate the complexities of assigning blame. It discusses the principle 'ought implies can,' distinguishing between moral and causal responsibility, and examines how external factors and different types of luck affect moral judgments. The video also considers the difference between harm and wrongdoing, and the societal implications of assigning praise and blame.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the scenario of A and B, what is the main reason B is considered more blameworthy?

B was more intoxicated than A.

B encountered a child on the road.

B left the party later than A.

B drove faster than A.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the principle 'ought implies can' suggest about moral responsibility?

You can be praised for any positive outcome.

You are responsible for all outcomes of your actions.

You are only responsible for actions within your control.

You should always be blamed for unintended consequences.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the example of the coconut illustrate the difference between causal and moral responsibility?

It shows that all actions have moral implications.

It indicates that causal responsibility always leads to moral blame.

It highlights that only intentional actions are morally responsible.

It demonstrates that unintentional actions can still be blameworthy.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the dressing room scenario, why is the creep's action considered wrong despite no harm being experienced?

Because privacy violations are wrong regardless of awareness.

Because harm must be felt to be real.

Because the pictures were shared publicly.

Because the creep intended to cause harm.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Thomas Nagel suggest about the role of luck in moral responsibility?

Luck has no impact on moral actions.

Luck only affects the outcome, not the morality of actions.

Different types of luck can influence the morality of actions.

Luck determines whether an action is right or wrong.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which type of luck relates to the inherent traits and personality of an individual?

Constitutive luck

Circumstantial luck

Antecedent luck

Consequent luck

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why might society choose to assign praise and blame even for actions outside a person's control?

To ensure fairness in all situations.

To accurately reflect moral responsibility.

To encourage and discourage certain behaviors.

To simplify legal processes.