CLEAN : Climate groups take on Shell in landmark Dutch case

The transcript discusses a legal case against Shell, urging the company to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 50% over the next decade. Shell argues that responsibility for climate change is shared globally, but the plaintiffs emphasize Shell's significant role as a major polluter. The impact of emissions is highlighted, particularly in vulnerable regions of the global South. The courts are seen as a last resort to enforce climate action, with hopes that a favorable ruling will prompt other companies to act responsibly without legal intervention.

What is the main goal of the legal action against Shell?

• To increase Shell's market share

• To reduce Shell's greenhouse gas emissions by 50% in 10 years

• To promote Shell's brand globally

• To stop Shell from operating in the Netherlands

According to Shell, who is responsible for climate change?

• Only the consumers

• Everyone except Shell

• Only the government

• Only Shell

Where are the damages from Shell's emissions most felt?

• In Europe

• In the Netherlands

• In the global South

• In the United States

What is the preferred outcome instead of going to court?

• To expand Shell's operations

• To increase Shell's profits

• To have climate plans aligned with the Paris Agreement

• To reduce consumer responsibility

What is hoped to be achieved by taking Shell to court?

• To set a precedent for other companies

• To close down Shell

• To reduce the urgency of climate action

• To increase Shell's emissions