Firing Backlash Led to Google CEO Apology: Timnit Gebru

The transcript discusses the retraction of a research paper and the lack of communication from HR. It critiques Sundar Pichai's apology, highlighting issues of gaslighting and termination without proper process. The challenges of conducting ethical AI research at Google are explored, along with the company's diversity and equity efforts. The speaker shares future plans, including presenting the controversial paper at a conference.

What was the main issue with the retraction of the research paper?

• The paper contained factual errors.

• There was no prior discussion with the authors.

• The paper was not completed.

• The authors wanted to retract it themselves.

How did the interviewee perceive Sundar Pichai's apology?

• As a personal apology to them.

• As an apology for the backlash, not the treatment.

• As a promise to reinstate them.

• As a sincere apology for their treatment.

What is necessary for successful ethical AI research according to the interviewee?

• Immediate publication of all research.

• Introspection and respect for researchers.

• Termination of dissenting researchers.

• Censorship of controversial topics.

What does the interviewee believe about Google's diversity commitments?

• They are genuine and lead to change.

• They are not backed by real incentives.

• They are unnecessary in the tech industry.

• They are fully implemented and effective.

What are the interviewee's plans regarding the controversial paper?

• They will rewrite it completely.

• They have decided not to publish it.

• They will present it if accepted at a conference.

• They plan to withdraw it permanently.