CLEAN : Finland trial over Liberia war crimes opens: defence and prosecution react

The video discusses a case involving events in Liberia and the Finnish police's efforts to investigate. It highlights the importance of hearing witnesses in their local environment and the challenges of bringing them to Finland. The Finnish police's proactive approach in negotiating with Liberian authorities and conducting investigations locally is praised. The video also touches on the legal obligations imposed on Finnish authorities to investigate suspected crimes.

Why was it difficult to bring witnesses to Finland?

• The witnesses were unwilling to travel.

• It was logistically challenging and costly.

• The witnesses were not considered reliable.

• The Finnish court did not allow foreign witnesses.

What was the role of the Finnish National Bureau of Investigation in Liberia?

• They trained local police in Liberia.

• They set up a temporary court in Liberia.

• They provided legal advice to Liberian authorities.

• They negotiated with Liberian authorities and conducted investigations.

What was the significance of the Finnish police's actions in Liberia?

• They improved relations between Finland and Liberia.

• They demonstrated extraordinary commitment to justice.

• They discovered new evidence in the case.

• They set a precedent for international cooperation.

Why was conducting investigations in Liberia considered the best solution for witnesses?

• It was faster than bringing them to Finland.

• It was cheaper for the Finnish authorities.

• It allowed witnesses to stay in their familiar environment.

• It was a requirement by the Liberian government.

What obligation does Finnish legislation impose on authorities when a crime is suspected?

• To immediately arrest the suspect.

• To seek international assistance.

• To inform the public about the investigation.

• To investigate the crime.