R.Kelly attorney speaks to press after verdict

The transcript discusses the process of discovery and how narratives are selected, particularly in the context of Cheryl Mack and R Kelly. It touches on marketing and consistency issues, reactions to the situation, and concerns about decency. The final section covers Mr. Kelly's response to the verdict, highlighting his shock despite the testimony.

What was the government's approach during the discovery process?

• They selected a version that matched a pre-existing narrative.

• They ignored all witness statements.

• They created a new narrative.

• They considered all versions equally.

What was the role of Cheryl Mack in the narrative?

• She was a witness.

• She was a government official.

• She was unrelated to the case.

• She initiated the narrative.

What issue is highlighted in the second section regarding the narrative?

• The narrative was consistent throughout.

• There were multiple inconsistencies in the narrative.

• The narrative was universally accepted.

• The narrative was never questioned.

How did Mr. Kelly react to the verdict?

• He was indifferent.

• He was shocked despite the testimony.

• He was pleased with the outcome.

• He expected the verdict.

What does the final section reveal about the emotions of those involved?

• There was shock and disbelief.

• Everyone was calm and composed.

• There was a sense of relief.

• There was unanimous agreement.