Sean Napier challenging DUP boycott of north south ministerial meetings

The transcript discusses a court case involving the DUP ministers' response to legal document exchanges. The focus is on government mechanisms, particularly the scheduling of North South Ministerial Council meetings. The attorney general's role in advising ministers on legal obligations is highlighted. The Good Friday Agreement's protection is emphasized, and the court's detailed examination of government workings is noted. Issues with meeting scheduling and unusual circumstances in the joint office are also discussed.

What was the court expecting from the DUP ministers?

• A financial settlement

• A resignation letter

• An exchange of legal documents

• A public apology

Why did the court suggest involving the attorney general?

• To represent the DUP in court

• To mediate between the parties

• To provide legal advice to the ministers

• To draft new legislation

What agreement is the judge particularly concerned with protecting?

• The Brexit Agreement

• The Paris Climate Agreement

• The Schengen Agreement

• The Good Friday Agreement

What is the court currently examining in relation to the Joint Office?

• The powers to frustrate government workings

• The public relations strategy

• The election process

• The financial records

What unusual situation is highlighted regarding the First Minister?

• The First Minister is not represented

• The First Minister was promoted

• The First Minister changed political parties

• The First Minister resigned