Sean Napier challenging DUP boycott of north south ministerial meetings

Sean Napier challenging DUP boycott of north south ministerial meetings

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses a court case involving the DUP ministers' response to legal document exchanges. The focus is on government mechanisms, particularly the scheduling of North South Ministerial Council meetings. The attorney general's role in advising ministers on legal obligations is highlighted. The Good Friday Agreement's protection is emphasized, and the court's detailed examination of government workings is noted. Issues with meeting scheduling and unusual circumstances in the joint office are also discussed.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the court expecting from the DUP ministers?

A financial settlement

A resignation letter

An exchange of legal documents

A public apology

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did the court suggest involving the attorney general?

To represent the DUP in court

To mediate between the parties

To provide legal advice to the ministers

To draft new legislation

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What agreement is the judge particularly concerned with protecting?

The Brexit Agreement

The Paris Climate Agreement

The Schengen Agreement

The Good Friday Agreement

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the court currently examining in relation to the Joint Office?

The powers to frustrate government workings

The public relations strategy

The election process

The financial records

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What unusual situation is highlighted regarding the First Minister?

The First Minister is not represented

The First Minister was promoted

The First Minister changed political parties

The First Minister resigned