Former Immigration Official on Djokovic's Legal Bid

The transcript discusses the visa issues faced by Novak Djokovic in Australia due to policy changes by the Australian Border Force. Initially, exemptions granted by states were not scrutinized, but a new policy required a review of these exemptions. Djokovic's visa was canceled as a result. The transcript explores the potential consequences of deportation or detention, suggesting that resolving the issue amicably would be preferable. The legal proceedings are complex and could be prolonged, with possible appeals from either Djokovic or the Commonwealth.

What was the Australian Border Force's policy before January 6th, 2021, regarding exemptions granted by states?

• They always verified the exemptions.

• They did not verify the exemptions.

• They only verified exemptions for athletes.

• They verified exemptions only for non-citizens.

What change in policy affected Djokovic upon his arrival in Australia?

• The government stopped issuing visas.

• The government started verifying exemptions.

• The government decided to accept all exemptions.

• The government allowed only vaccinated individuals.

What would be the impact on Australia's image if Djokovic were deported?

• It would make Australia appear petty and disorganized.

• It would make Australia look organized.

• It would enhance Australia's reputation.

• It would have no impact on Australia's image.

What is a potential legal action that could prolong Djokovic's case?

• An appeal by Djokovic or the Commonwealth.

• A public vote on the case.

• A quick decision by the judge.

• Immediate deportation without trial.

What approach has the judge taken regarding the timeline of the case?

• The judge is making a rapid decision.

• The judge is not rushing the decision.

• The judge is rushing the decision.

• The judge is not allowing any delays.