John Bercow responds after bullying claims upheld

The speaker discusses the lack of evidence in past situations and their stance on apologies, emphasizing they only apologize when justified. They express pride in their Labour Party membership and address issues of confidentiality breaches. The speaker criticizes the use of parliamentary privilege to avoid scrutiny and defends their actions against opposition. They acknowledge Katherine Stone's role but question her qualifications in assessing bullying cases.

What is the speaker's view on apologizing without a valid reason?

• They believe in apologizing regardless of the situation.

• They apologize only when pressured by others.

• They never apologize under any circumstances.

• They only apologize when they feel it is justified.

How does the speaker feel about their membership in the Labour Party?

• They wish to leave the party.

• They are proud to be a member.

• They are indifferent about it.

• They are unsure about their membership.

What is the speaker's stance on lectures about confidentiality breaches?

• They find them helpful.

• They reject them.

• They are indifferent to them.

• They welcome such lectures.

What does the speaker criticize about the use of parliamentary privilege?

• It is being used to promote transparency.

• It is being used for its intended purpose.

• It is being used to encourage legal challenges.

• It is being used to resist scrutiny.

How does the speaker describe Katherine Stone?

• As a dedicated public servant.

• As a qualified lawyer.

• As an unqualified individual.

• As an expert in bullying cases.