3 Times Scientists Did Weird Experiments With Rubber Ducks

3 Times Scientists Did Weird Experiments With Rubber Ducks

Assessment

Interactive Video

Science, Geography, Biology

11th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video explores the surprising scientific uses of rubber ducks. Initially, rubber ducks were used to study ocean currents after a cargo spill in 1992, leading to insights about gyres and ocean pollution. Later, NASA used rubber ducks to investigate glacial runoff in Greenland, although the experiment did not yield results. More recently, rubber duck decoys were employed in a wildlife counting challenge in Australia, demonstrating the effectiveness of drone photography and algorithms in wildlife conservation efforts.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the primary scientific purpose of tracking the rubber ducks lost at sea in 1992?

To study the effects of pollution on marine life

To understand ocean currents and gyres

To measure the temperature of ocean water

To track the migration patterns of sea turtles

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did NASA use rubber ducks in their glacial runoff study in Greenland?

To measure the speed of glacial movement

To study the effects of climate change on wildlife

To test the durability of rubber in cold conditions

To track water flow beneath the ice

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of NASA's rubber duck experiment in Greenland?

The ducks were retrieved by local scientists

The ducks melted due to high temperatures

The ducks were never found

The ducks were found and provided valuable data

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the wildlife counting experiment, what was found to be more accurate than traditional methods?

Manual counting by volunteers

Using telescopes

Using drone photos

Counting with binoculars

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What potential advantage does using algorithms for wildlife counting offer?

It reduces the need for human intervention

It is more expensive than traditional methods

It requires more time to analyze data

It is less accurate than manual counting