Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe criticises UK Government for taking six years to bring her home

The speaker expresses disagreement with the actions of the UK Foreign Secretary, highlighting the unprecedented change of five secretaries over six years. They recount being repeatedly promised a return home, which never materialized, leading to distrust. The speaker criticizes the inefficiency of having multiple Foreign Secretaries involved in their case. Finally, they reflect on their return home on March 17, 2022, exactly six years after leaving London, emphasizing that this should have happened much earlier.

What does the speaker find unusual about the changes in the Foreign Secretary position?

• There have been five changes in six years.

• The position has remained unchanged for decades.

• The Foreign Secretary is elected by the public.

• The position is usually held by the same person for life.

How does the speaker feel about the promises made by the Foreign Secretaries?

• They feel reassured and confident.

• They feel grateful for the attention.

• They feel indifferent and unaffected.

• They feel distrustful due to unfulfilled promises.

What does the speaker imply about the effectiveness of the Foreign Secretaries?

• They were unable to fulfill their promises.

• They were all from the same political party.

• They were not involved in the speaker's case.

• They were highly effective in their roles.

What significant date does the speaker mention in relation to their return?

• 17th of March 2022

• 1st of January 2020

• 25th of December 2018

• 14th of February 2019

According to the speaker, how long should their imprisonment have lasted?

• One year

• Three years

• Six years

• It should not have happened at all