Senate Votes 100-0 To End Russia Trade Status, Enact Oil Ban

Senate Votes 100-0 To End Russia Trade Status, Enact Oil Ban

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses a rare bipartisan agreement in Congress, focusing on two unanimous Senate votes related to Russia: revoking permanent trade status and banning Russian oil and energy imports. These votes, which passed 100-0, highlight a significant moment of unity in a typically divided Congress. The bills, having already passed the House, require further approval due to Senate amendments. The collaboration between the House and Senate is seen as a positive step, with hopes for swift approval and delivery to President Biden.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main topic discussed in the introduction of the video?

The rare bipartisan agreement in Congress

The procedural vote for Judge Jackson

The economic impact of sanctions on Russia

The history of U.S. sanctions against Russia

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the Senate votes on Russia-related issues?

They were passed with a narrow majority

They were rejected by the Senate

They were postponed for further discussion

They were passed unanimously

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the significance of the unanimous votes in the Senate?

They were a routine legislative procedure

They showed a rare moment of bipartisanship

They indicated a shift in U.S. foreign policy

They highlighted the division within Congress

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What needs to happen next for the bills related to Russia?

They need to be signed by the President

They need to be approved by the House again

They need to be debated in the Senate

They need to be reviewed by the Supreme Court

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the final section suggest about future cooperation in Congress?

It will lead to more partisan conflicts

It is a hopeful sign of more bipartisanship

It is irrelevant to future legislative processes

It is unlikely to happen again