Finland and Sweden have announced their intentions to join NATO, ending decades of military neutrality. The process involves formal applications and approval from all 30 NATO member nations, which could take time due to Turkey's unfavorable view. Security concerns exist for Finland and Sweden during the interim period before receiving NATO's Article 5 protection. The US has expressed confidence in supporting these nations if needed. Sweden's defense minister is set to meet with the US Secretary of Defense to discuss NATO membership and Ukraine. Russia has stated it does not see Finland and Sweden as immediate threats but warned against military infrastructure expansion in those territories.

What significant change is Finland making regarding its military stance?

• Forming a new military alliance with Russia

• Increasing its defense budget

• Joining the European Union

• Ending military neutrality by joining NATO

What is a potential challenge in the NATO membership approval process for Finland and Sweden?

• Opposition from the United States

• Lack of military capabilities

• Financial constraints

• Turkey's unfavorable view

What concern exists for Finland and Sweden during the interim period before full NATO membership?

• Security risks without Article 5 protection

• Political instability

• Economic sanctions

• Loss of trade partners

How does the U.S. view its relationship with Finland and Sweden during the NATO application process?

• As a new and untested partnership

• As a competitive rivalry

• As a temporary alliance

• As a comfortable and familiar relationship

What is Russia's stance on Finland and Sweden's NATO membership?

• It sees it as an immediate threat

• It has no problem but warns against military infrastructure expansion

• It fully supports their decision

• It plans to impose sanctions